We help leadership teams test the project narrative against available evidence, identify value at risk and prioritise recovery action — before further spend, supplier extensions, revised timelines or go-live decisions are approved.
"We knew delivery was failing. We just couldn't evidence it — or cascade it upwards."
This is the moment we are built for. We enter where ambiguity is highest and give leadership the structured, evidence-backed analysis they need to act with confidence — before further commitments are made.
Every material project decision carries risk. We provide independent diagnostic evidence at the moments that matter most — before leadership commits to a course of action on incomplete or contradictory information.
The question is not whether to commission a diagnostic. It is whether the cost of proceeding without one — in spend, timeline, supplier commitment and reputational exposure — outweighs it. We help leadership answer that question with evidence, not instinct.
Evidence-based project diagnostics and recovery advisory for organisations that cannot afford guesswork on high-stakes programmes.
We analyse your project documentation, governance artefacts and delivery data against our proprietary Project Health Index — returning a structured, evidence-backed diagnostic that tells leadership where the programme stands, where confidence is limited and what to prioritise before further decisions are made.
Delivered rapidly — timelines confirmed at scoping, dependent on project complexity, evidence volume and stakeholder availability.
Request a Health Check →Every engagement works from the evidence that exists — board packs, RAID logs, supplier reports, financial trackers, defect logs, change records, stakeholder accounts and any other available project artefacts.
Where that evidence is strong, we say so. Where it is weak, missing, stale or internally contradictory, we identify it, assess the impact on decision confidence and flag what is needed before leadership proceeds.
Scores are never presented in isolation. Each PHI dimension is interpreted alongside its evidence sufficiency rating, confidence level and any identified contradictions — so leadership understands not just what the score is, but how much weight to place on it.
Official reporting is compared against operational artefacts. Where the two diverge — whether in status, delivery progress, commercial exposure or readiness — we identify the contradiction, assess its materiality and explain what it means for the decision at hand.
These are the signals leadership rarely sees until it is too late. Each one represents exposed risk — carried without visibility.
Engagements are led by the nature of the programme and the decision in front of leadership — not by job title alone. The common thread is a complex project, a material commitment approaching and a need for evidence that the internal picture cannot provide.
Our proprietary diagnostic framework — a structured, weighted scoring model evaluating project health across ten delivery dimensions. Unlike RAG ratings or subjective audits, the PHI produces a reproducible, evidence-backed assessment that leadership can act on.
PHI scores are interpreted alongside evidence sufficiency, confidence, contradictions and trajectory — not presented in isolation.
Engagements are deliberately bounded. The Health Check is an independent diagnostic — not a delivery takeover. What is included is agreed at scoping and stated clearly before work begins.
A 30-minute discovery call is all it takes to scope an engagement. No commitment. No slide deck. A direct conversation about your programme — and whether an independent diagnostic is warranted.